Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
That's interesting - could you send me your output.tex.sh script, or if you
prefer, a
sanitized version of it that demonstrates what you need done? I'd be happy to
look into
this.
Original comment by shiblon
on 18 Aug 2009 at 3:24
Actually, by "send me", I mean "attach to this issue". :-)
Original comment by shiblon
on 18 Aug 2009 at 3:25
I'm marking this as WontFix for now, unless I hear back from you. There are a
couple
of reasons that I'm hesitant to do this:
1) There is a nice facility for doing this, now, complete with make's file
handling: just
create a Makefile.ini in the same directory with the rules to build your .tex
file, and
you're all set.
2) All instances of graphic generation that result in a .tex file so far have
been
extremely painful to add because LaTeX does not plow through missing .tex file
errors like it does with others (like missing graphics files), so running it in
batchmode
only generates a single missing file, which we then build, and then we run into
another one, etc. It's messy, and the makefile doesn't handle it well at all.
The pstex
support is an example of this.
Original comment by shiblon
on 19 Nov 2009 at 6:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
afaulcon...@googlemail.com
on 18 Aug 2009 at 12:32