Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Changing to "New", since I haven't actually looked at it yet.
Original comment by shiblon
on 12 Mar 2010 at 5:23
Is this still happening, and is there a minimal example that you can post (a
.tex file and
.gpi or something) that reproduces this behavior?
Original comment by shiblon
on 12 Mar 2010 at 7:43
I just did an "hg pull -u", and I'm still seeing the problem. I'll point you
at an
example by private email.
Original comment by amcna...@gmail.com
on 12 Mar 2010 at 11:07
The best thing would be for me to see the .log output when you run the
following
command:
pdflatex -interaction=batchmode poster
Then I can look at it and hopefully see what's missing.
Original comment by shiblon
on 15 Mar 2010 at 4:04
Here is the new log file.
Original comment by amcna...@gmail.com
on 15 Mar 2010 at 4:15
Attachments:
Weird! That should totally work! The very first thing that happens when
building the
.pdf target is to colorize the latex errors. If anything is output (because it
found a
bad graphics extension, for example), then it fails with a fatal error.
Odd stuff.
So, here's the next thing that would help. Run
make clean; make -d poster &> make.out
And send me that :)
Original comment by shiblon
on 15 Mar 2010 at 5:33
Attaching make.out as requested. If things get too crazy, feel free to use the
copy
on guru that I emailed you about.
Original comment by amcna...@gmail.com
on 15 Mar 2010 at 5:47
Attachments:
The make.out file looks like the result of calling make SHELL_DEBUG=1. What I
really
need is the output of make -d.
Original comment by shiblon
on 16 Mar 2010 at 1:33
Scratch that - I was looking at the wrong file.
Original comment by shiblon
on 16 Mar 2010 at 1:34
Fixed the problem. Very, very subtle interaction between make functions (e.g.,
$(wildcard)) and shell commands in command execution.
See the diff for r0eb58b650c83
This and the fix before it should make your experience much more stable.
In fact, I found an issue that may make it possible to add __gray back in.
Let's discuss.
Original comment by shiblon
on 16 Mar 2010 at 2:03
I now have a beautiful error message. :)
Original comment by amcna...@gmail.com
on 16 Mar 2010 at 4:10
Original comment by shiblon
on 16 Mar 2010 at 4:19
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
amcna...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2010 at 9:54Attachments: