yodamaster / include-what-you-use

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

google code is closing; migrate to github #182

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Google code has announced that it is closing.

Presumably this project will migrate to github?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by legal...@xmission.com on 6 Apr 2015 at 4:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I think so, I just sent out an e-mail to the project mailing list [1] asking 
for options. GitHub would be my personal preferred choice, but I don't know if 
there are other favorites among the maintainers.

[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/include-what-you-use/F0DLAkAh22k

Original comment by kim.gras...@gmail.com on 6 Apr 2015 at 4:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I am OK with GitHub, does anybody have other suggestions? There are other 
services, but I don't know any that have unique features useful for IWYU.

I plan to prepare a migration todo list, if nobody beats me to it. And I want 
to discuss a few naming issues.

Original comment by vsap...@gmail.com on 7 Apr 2015 at 6:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Why not clang-extra-tools?

See 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/include-what-you-use/IK0JyZ2sSlc/bWjuX3h9PJAJ.

Original comment by Eugene.Z...@gmail.com on 8 Apr 2015 at 10:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Migrating to clang-extra-tools requires code changes, while migrating to GitHub 
should be only infrastructure change.

Original comment by vsap...@gmail.com on 11 Apr 2015 at 7:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
And to answer Dave Johansen.

> I personally like Mercurial's interface a lot more than git's, so I would 
prefer bitbucket over github, but I'm glad to use/support whatever the choice 
is.

I also prefer Mercurial's interface and sometimes use hg-git to work with Git 
repos from Mercurial.

Regarding BitBucket and GitHub, personally I prefer GitHub. The only thing I 
like about BitBucket is that it provides free private repos, but for IWYU it 
doesn't matter. Another advantage of GitHub is it is more popular. Sorry, I 
don't have evidence to support this statement, but it definitely feels like 
GitHub is more popular than BitBucket.

Original comment by vsap...@gmail.com on 11 Apr 2015 at 7:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I agree that GitHub seems to be a lot more popular and also has more 
features/bells and whistles than Bitbucket, so I wouldn't opposed to picking 
GitHub/git over Bitbucket/Mercurial.

Original comment by davejohansen on 12 Apr 2015 at 3:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
As we are moving stuff around, I was thinking about changing domain name for 
downloads. I suggest to change include-what-you-use.com to 
include-what-you-use.org. include-what-you-use.com will continue working as 
before.

And another suggestion is to use include-what-you-use as canonical name, but 
provide convenience shortcut iwyu whenever possible. For example, iwyu.org will 
work as include-what-you-use.org. Does anybody have objections?

Original comment by vsap...@gmail.com on 12 Apr 2015 at 11:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
None at all. On the contrary :-)

I'd also like to introduce an iwyu alias for the binary at some point.

Original comment by kim.gras...@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2015 at 5:25