Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I think so, I just sent out an e-mail to the project mailing list [1] asking
for options. GitHub would be my personal preferred choice, but I don't know if
there are other favorites among the maintainers.
[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/include-what-you-use/F0DLAkAh22k
Original comment by kim.gras...@gmail.com
on 6 Apr 2015 at 4:34
I am OK with GitHub, does anybody have other suggestions? There are other
services, but I don't know any that have unique features useful for IWYU.
I plan to prepare a migration todo list, if nobody beats me to it. And I want
to discuss a few naming issues.
Original comment by vsap...@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2015 at 6:47
Why not clang-extra-tools?
See
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/include-what-you-use/IK0JyZ2sSlc/bWjuX3h9PJAJ.
Original comment by Eugene.Z...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2015 at 10:46
Migrating to clang-extra-tools requires code changes, while migrating to GitHub
should be only infrastructure change.
Original comment by vsap...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2015 at 7:33
And to answer Dave Johansen.
> I personally like Mercurial's interface a lot more than git's, so I would
prefer bitbucket over github, but I'm glad to use/support whatever the choice
is.
I also prefer Mercurial's interface and sometimes use hg-git to work with Git
repos from Mercurial.
Regarding BitBucket and GitHub, personally I prefer GitHub. The only thing I
like about BitBucket is that it provides free private repos, but for IWYU it
doesn't matter. Another advantage of GitHub is it is more popular. Sorry, I
don't have evidence to support this statement, but it definitely feels like
GitHub is more popular than BitBucket.
Original comment by vsap...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2015 at 7:38
I agree that GitHub seems to be a lot more popular and also has more
features/bells and whistles than Bitbucket, so I wouldn't opposed to picking
GitHub/git over Bitbucket/Mercurial.
Original comment by davejohansen
on 12 Apr 2015 at 3:32
As we are moving stuff around, I was thinking about changing domain name for
downloads. I suggest to change include-what-you-use.com to
include-what-you-use.org. include-what-you-use.com will continue working as
before.
And another suggestion is to use include-what-you-use as canonical name, but
provide convenience shortcut iwyu whenever possible. For example, iwyu.org will
work as include-what-you-use.org. Does anybody have objections?
Original comment by vsap...@gmail.com
on 12 Apr 2015 at 11:00
None at all. On the contrary :-)
I'd also like to introduce an iwyu alias for the binary at some point.
Original comment by kim.gras...@gmail.com
on 13 Apr 2015 at 5:25
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
legal...@xmission.com
on 6 Apr 2015 at 4:21