yoheinakajima
commented
1 year ago Hey I love this! I'm reviewing from mobile which makes why merge conflicts hard to manage, but if you're able to fix happy to pull this in!
Closed velocitatem closed 1 year ago
yoheinakajima
commented
1 year ago Hey I love this! I'm reviewing from mobile which makes why merge conflicts hard to manage, but if you're able to fix happy to pull this in!
coderabbitai[bot]
commented
1 year ago The changes primarily focus on enhancing the handling of OpenAI's JSON response. A new function correct_json() is introduced to ensure the validity of the JSON data. The get_response_data() function now utilizes this correction mechanism and returns a tuple for better error handling.
| File | Summary |
|---|---|
| main.py | Introduced correct_json() to validate and correct JSON responses from OpenAI. Updated get_response_data() to use this function and return a tuple (response_data, 200). Minor formatting updates and comments added for clarity. |
🐇💻
In the land of code, where the brackets lie,
A rabbit hopped in, with an eagle's eye.
Fixed some JSON, made it shine,
Now the data flows, oh so fine!
With tuples returned, and errors caught,
A better script, the rabbit has wrought! 🎉
Hi! Love the project! I observed that when dealing with larger inputs, the integration often struggles to properly parse the JSON data, usually due to trailing commas. To address this, I've implemented a function that automatically corrects the JSON formatting for those cases :)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
correct_json()to ensure the JSON response from OpenAI is valid. This prevents potential errors during further processing.get_response_data()function to usecorrect_json(), enhancing the reliability of data extraction.get_response_data()to return a tuple(response_data, 200), improving the clarity of response status handling.