search

yomorun / hashids-java

Hashids algorithm v1.0.0 implementation in Java
http://hashids.org
MIT License
1.02k stars 156 forks source link

V2 Proposal #55

Open 0x3333 opened 6 years ago

0x3333 commented 6 years ago

Version 2.0 Proposal

This issue will be a discussion point to exchange ideas about version 2.0.

Big picture

The community is urging for a more java idiom version, and the current version can't handle these changes, that's why I'm proposing a new version, incorporating all the needs from the community in a broad discussion.

What about v2?

The new version must be compatible with original implementation as much as it can, without sacrificing java idiom. We will discuss how it will be implemented and the design considerations will be made here.

@cazacugmihai Proposal

@iggymoran Proposal

@KangoV Proposal

Reference implementation PR #53.

cazacugmihai commented 6 years ago

We can include these points in the TODO list.

Also, the 2.0.0 branch can be started from this point.

kmandeville commented 6 years ago

Has this library gone dark? Haven't been any updates for about 6 months?

0x3333 commented 6 years ago

I'd would say it is stable... :)

As soon as I have some time, I'll work on 2.0.

kmandeville commented 6 years ago

:)

Yes, definitely stable! I was mainly wondering because of some issues I had been following to see if there were any updates or if there were going to be. It wasn't anything major. Just an edge case around ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException being thrown. We can work around it though. Thanks!

0x3333 commented 6 years ago

Mind opening an issue for this ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException?

kmandeville commented 6 years ago

There was one already that I thought you had fixed, but I was waiting for a new release. It doesn't look like there was one. https://github.com/jiecao-fm/hashids-java/issues/45

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Tercio Gaudencio Filho < notifications@github.com> wrote:

Mind opening an issue for this ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException?

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jiecao-fm/hashids-java/issues/55#issuecomment-391326800, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABql-N_-Wqv3a6R3pgv19f1fW5O7Qcmwks5t1VSYgaJpZM4SXN7i .

0x3333 commented 6 years ago

It was issued... 1.0.3. Maybe this is another bug...

KangoV commented 6 years ago

Any chance of being able to accept BigInteger as input/output?

eriknyk commented 4 years ago

what happened with v2? still not released...

XhstormR commented 2 years ago

ping

fanweixiao commented 2 years ago

@0x3333 seems busy. is there anyone interest in v2.0 implementation? @eriknyk @XhstormR

eriknyk commented 2 years ago

@fanweixiao yes

0x3333 commented 2 years ago

Hi everyone. Sorry for the long delay, I'm quite busy here.

I believe a v2 is a must, I'll try to work it out next week. Any new requirements?

chenzhenjia commented 2 months ago

@0x3333 Can it be merged?

0x3333 commented 2 months ago

I’m not working with hashids anymore. Take a look at https://github.com/sqids/sqids-java

chenzhenjia commented 2 months ago

I’m not working with hashids anymore. Take a look at https://github.com/sqids/sqids-java

hashids supports custom secret, which sqids cannot do

rgmz commented 2 months ago

I’m not working with hashids anymore. Take a look at https://github.com/sqids/sqids-java

hashids supports custom secret, which sqids cannot do

"Secret" or "salt" was a misnomer.

The salt parameter was used to shuffle the alphabet, and it was never meant to be associated with security or safety. Both Hashids and Sqids work similarly to the way decimal to hexadecimal conversion works but with a few adjustments. There is no encryption of any kind, so to avoid confusion, that parameter has been removed completely.

https://sqids.org/faq#salt