fanweixiao
commented
1 year ago Hi @lonnietc,
- the benchmark of QUIC compared to TCP, I strongly recommend fastly's blog post: https://www.fastly.com/blog/measuring-quic-vs-tcp-computational-efficiency.
- there are kinds of QUIC implementation in different languages, the comparison can be found here: https://www.net.in.tum.de/fileadmin/TUM/NET/NET-2022-07-1/NET-2022-07-1_02.pdf, compared Quiche from Cloudflare, Mvfast from Meta, Msquic from Microsoft, also include quic-go which we use, and other implementations
- hysteria project made a benchmark with TCP Cubic, TCP BBR and kcptun in 2021, can be found here: https://github.com/apernet/hysteria/blob/master/docs/bench/bench.png
- at last, QUIC will perform better when networking goes worse, if you want to test QUIC for your P2P gaming scenario, you can use
tcto simulate the network conditions likepacket drop rateandlatency, there are great posts brief this: https://www.badunetworks.com/traffic-shaping-with-tc/, https://netbeez.net/blog/how-to-use-the-linux-traffic-control/, https://github.com/ngtcp2/ngtcp2/issues/333 and https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/tc.8.html
Hope this helped.
Hello,
I am researching transport protocols over IP and am seeking something new and extremely fast for high density P2P applications that need ultra-low latency in their communications.
I came across your yomo pages and was wondering how this protocol compares to TCP, UDP, QUIC, and others as far as latency?
Best regards and have a good day