Open sunnycqcn opened 4 years ago
Hi,
The scripts will skip the different ids within CDS and proteins, and only the consisted sequences will be used in the following analysis. In the total pipeline, you should supply the CDS and protein files. If you only exist the CDS file, you can translate them by scripts or some only websites (for example: https://web.expasy.org/translate/ ; https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/st/emboss_transeq/). WGDdetector is designed for detecting the WGDs within one species. Because of the speciation or other events will influence the interpretation of the results, the best way is searching them one by one when you facing multiple species.
Thanks, Fuyou
Hello, I got the result as following figure. I am not sure if it is good? I am much appreciated for your help. Fuyou final.ks.distribution.list.pdf
The result seems correctly, and the ancient duplicated peak is very markable (ks: ~2). The peak around zero may reflect the tandem duplication or assembly errors, such like redundant haplotigs.
Hello, I am much appreciated for your suggestions. I have understand some. I compared wgd of 160 isolates fungal genome. They are almost same pattern. But the peak values are different. Some are about 2, some are greater than 2, some less than 2. Can I say the whole genome duplication adaptive the fungal genome evolution? Or can I get other information? Thanks, Fuyou
You need more information to identify the WGD events are the same one or indipendent occured within each species. You should try methods based on tree topology (phylogeny method) or Ks values correction (beacause different species contained different mutation rate)
I have finished the tree analysis with orthofinder. I will try to use ks correction. Thanks Fuyou
Hello, I find in example file, the name is not corresponding with the protein. I am a newer. I did not understand the relationship between CDS and protein. Was the protein obtained by translated CDS? If I want to compare the WGD relusts of a few specices, can I combine all protein or analyze one by one? Thanks, Fuyou