Wouldn't it make sense for the Storage Client to be clonable?

[open-schnick]

Currently the Storage Client is not clone. It also cannot be derived directly because ServiceAccountClient is also not clone Can we derive that on these two structs or does that introduce sideeffects? I would imagine that duplicating the ServiceAccountClient means duplicating the authentication logic. Thoughts @yoshidan?

[yoshidan]

Since the Client and its children have not a few fields, for example, I think the allocation load to Clone for each request may be large. Currently, though, we would use Arc as follows,

let client = Arc::new(client)
let client_per_each_request = client.clone()

I think it would be nice to have Arc inside as well as other components.

#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct Client {
    inner: Arc<InternalClient>
}

struct InternalClient {
    default_google_access_id: Option<String>,
    default_sign_by: Option<SignBy>,
    storage_client: StorageClient, default_account_client: Option<String>,
    service_account_client: ServiceAccountClient
}

[open-schnick]

Sorry for the late response, I wrapped the Client myself in an Arc. Thanks for your feedback :)