youngwanLEE / centermask2

[CVPR 2020] CenterMask : Real-time Anchor-Free Instance Segmentation
Other
778 stars 159 forks source link

could you provide V19-Lite trained models for Panoptic segmentation #54

Open griffintin opened 4 years ago

griffintin commented 4 years ago

Hi, @youngwanLEE

Thank you so much for sharing this amazing work. I am about to evaluate centermask for Panoptic segmentation, and mainly focused on low-power consumption models.

Is it possible to share models trained on V19-Lite-Slim architecture for Panoptic-Segmentation? V39 is really good, but i am wondering for a more compact network.

Thank you for your time and hopping to hearing from you.

griffintin commented 4 years ago

@youngwanLEE
hello, I trained V19-Lite-Slim for Panoptic-Segmentation, However, accuracy for mask AP is 24.2, bbox AP is 26.7 and PQ is 32.02. Since there is no provided data in your Git or in the paper for this architecture, I refer to mask AP in instance segmentation using the same architecture, which is 29.80.

you can see, mask AP in my own panoptic training is not as good as that in your provided instance segmentation. I have no idea why, can you share any ideas.

By the way, I disabled mask_scoring, which takes too many parameters.

Here is the config file:

CUDNN_BENCHMARK: false DATALOADER: ASPECT_RATIO_GROUPING: true FILTER_EMPTY_ANNOTATIONS: true NUM_WORKERS: 4 REPEAT_THRESHOLD: 0.0 SAMPLER_TRAIN: TrainingSampler DATASETS: PRECOMPUTED_PROPOSAL_TOPK_TEST: 1000 PRECOMPUTED_PROPOSAL_TOPK_TRAIN: 2000 PROPOSAL_FILES_TEST: [] PROPOSAL_FILES_TRAIN: [] TEST:

griffintin commented 4 years ago

@youngwanLEE

I think the results in the table of Panoptic-CenterMask are wrong. The data for box AP and mask AP are opposite.

abhigoku10 commented 1 year ago

@griffintin can you please share ur model on the onedrive or google drive ? it would be helpfull for panoptic segmentation