ypriverol / os-proteomics

View point in Open source in Proteomics
Apache License 2.0
5 stars 5 forks source link

Analysis of licenses used in proteomics #8

Open bittremieux opened 1 day ago

bittremieux commented 1 day ago

I scraped papers from PubMed published in JPR that mention a GitHub URL in the abstract (unfortunately it seems that even for OA papers the full text is not easily accessible) and calculated a few statistics. Sample size is 89 papers.

  1. Many don't have a license. Otherwise various open-source licenses are used.

By definition unfortunately the majority of closed source software won't be included in this analysis because they won't list a GitHub URL in their papers.

licenses

  1. GitHub stars don't correlate with paper citations. Nor do the number of contributors.

stars_vs_citations

Let me know if this is interesting and whether you can think of additional analyses.

ypriverol commented 22 hours ago

@bittremieux is interesting. You can see that unspecific is a more "common" license.