Closed mauricioarmani closed 5 years ago
Hi Thanks for your question. I guess you concluded 3x3 for 128x128 because of what figure 3 draws. The figure is for illustration. In supp 6.1 we clearly stated that the 128x128 resolution is using 1x1. We used 1x1 in our pretarined models and reported results. We do not conclude the optimal solution (1x1 or 3x3, etc) for different datasets.
My bad, I didn't see it on the paper. Thank for your help.
Hello,
I was printing some shapes and noticed that the local_imgdisc{} function outputs, for the three image's sizes, the following shapes:
64 --> (batch, 1, 1, 1) 128 --> (batch, 1, 1, 1) 256 --> (batch, 1, 5, 5)
It should't be (batch, 1, 3, 3) for the 128x128 image size?