Add a magnetometer

[Doncuppjr]

I think the seeed would support it, but could the firmware be updated to support a magnetometer for better pan support? I think we would also need some kind of configuration options for defining which axis takes that input, as currently the tracker can be put into almost any orientation and depending on where you mount it, an axis represents the pan.

[ysoldak]

Do you have a link to a Seeed board with magnetometer?

Yes, this is by design -- you put the tracker on your googles any way you see best and then you map in your radio the channels accordingly. No need to configure also in HT.

[Doncuppjr]

No. The seeed has SCL, SDA pins, and perhaps something like this https://www.amazon.com/AITRIP-QMC5883L-Compass-Magnetometer-Raspberry/dp/B08ZHKDJHD/ref=asc_df_B08ZHKDJHD/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=693270340473&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=36492099623008886&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9192860&hvtargid=pla-1949616210426&mcid=c136cb498293379ab57d185bcd935f53&th=1 could be soldered on to add a compass to the HT.

[Doncuppjr]

Maybe as both the seeed and mag are 3 axis, there could be a pairing pattern that would mitigate the need for configuration.

[ysoldak]

Sure, this is doable and we can define how a magnetometer board shall be mounted relative to main xiao board so we can skip configuration.

The usefulness though escapes me, since:

For a long time, Nano 33 BLE was the only board supported. It has an additional sensor, magnetometer, that head trackers usually use to eliminate pan drift. In practice, however, magnetometer adds more problems than solves. Magnetometer is very sensitive to environment and tricky to calibrate properly. In this project we do not use magnetometer and have a good zero-configuration automatic continuous gyro calibration instead to solve the drift problem. Already after first 5 seconds the calibration is good enough to stop the drift.

Can be a great fun addition. But only if we can make magnetometer auto-calibrate (I have some experiments in that direction). It's doable also, but as said probably is not worth the trouble.

Do you have problems currently with HT drifting on Xiao boards?

[Doncuppjr]

I don't know if I actually have drift problems. I'm just getting started with the HT, and some things don't work quite like I expect. I might try playing with the weights and see if that resolves what I'm experiencing, but it seems like drift might also be a factor. Maybe the HT is detecting a double tap and resetting or something.

I do wonder how important calibration actually is for this though. I don't expect the HT would actually need to output the heading to anything, but rather just a reference to the magnetic field to avoid any potential drift of the accelerometer. 

On Tuesday, October 1, 2024 at 02:02:50 AM MDT, Yurii Soldak @.***> wrote:

Sure, this is doable and we can define how a magnetometer board shall be mounted relative to main xiao board so we can skip configuration.

The usefulness though escapes me, since:

   For a long time, Nano 33 BLE was the only board supported. It has an additional sensor, magnetometer, that head trackers usually use to eliminate pan drift. In practice, however, magnetometer adds more problems than solves. Magnetometer is very sensitive to environment and tricky to calibrate properly. In this project we do not use magnetometer and have a good zero-configuration automatic continuous gyro calibration instead to solve the drift problem. Already after first 5 seconds the calibration is good enough to stop the drift.

Can be a great fun addition. But only if we can make magnetometer auto-calibrate (I have some experiments in that direction). It's doable also, but as said probably is not worth the trouble.

Do you have problems currently with HT drifting on Xiao boards?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>