Open ytatus94 opened 7 years ago
Hi Yu-Ting,
Thanks a lot for the careful checks! It looks like what I did in the cutflow using the framework here was missing an absolute value on the Dphi, which killed off all of the events with Dphi(lead jet,MET) < -2.5. That is 45% of the events, which means my yields should be larger by almost a factor of 2.
My entries also used the older b-tagging WP, which might explain why you have different numbers for the MET cut as well.
So I think what you're doing is correct, because the cuts all seem reasonable. I'm going to launch our new production today, and then I'll update the cutflow spreadsheet.
Thanks! Joey
Hi Yu-Ting,
We currently merge four DSIDs together for the Higgsino signal samples (whereas we originally did not). I think everyone filled in the cutflow before this merging, so if you require
DatasetNumber == 393408
, I think you might get a bit closer.Once things look reasonable, make sure to document your findings on HIGGSINO-19!
Joey