Open yu-ming-chen opened 3 years ago
It is not written in the textbook that there is a requirement to label the class of the returned object with the suggested label of “result:CommandResult”, neither does such representation (also reflected in AB3's User Guide and the textbook) affect the meaning of the sequence diagram. For these reasons, the bug is rejected with its severity downgraded to VeryLow.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: In this case, if you include result:CommandResult, it will be very clear to the developers that you are returning a CommandResult class. However, in this case, I am not sure where the result is coming from or what it is. This might create a lot of confusion.
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Low
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Result reference cannot be find anywhere else. can label :CommandResult with "result:CommandResult"