Open Frag17 opened 5 years ago
The names of the parameters are the same as those in the original paper, and there are the description about the parameters in README.
I think using random values is better for generalization, but I'm not sure.
did anyone have issues performing the pixel randomisation?
hi again- any chance you could check out my question here: https://github.com/yu4u/cutout-random-erasing/issues/6 I've still not had a reply from the owner of this repo
Hello, Can you explain what r_1 and r_2 stand for ? And why do you use random value to erase targeted area instead of 0? will this random value cause bad parameter update since it is not 0?