Closed Zhanzhang-2020 closed 1 year ago
Hi Zhan,
Thanks for your interest and feedback.
I made some changes to the getXYMatrices2 function, which was written by a trainee and I think it was of a different version than getXYMatrices. I suspect that there would be more errors, but could you please update the package and give it a try again? I will look into more if the problem persists.
For your other question, I would look at the union of the four testing, and likely together with the marginal/pairwise testing as well. From what they show, they overlap but are not the same and corroborates and complements with each other.
Yuchao
Thanks for the reply. I will update the package and try again, and will keep you posted.
Hi Yuchao,
Thanks for developing such wonderful tool! I have tried out the tool, everything went well and I just got some amazing results for my single-cell multiome data.
However, I did get some issues when I tried to handle the situation where multiple TFs could correspond to the same motifs. Here is the script I used:
And I got the following error when I tried running getTrios function:
I highly suspected there were something wrong in the GetTrio function, making it incompatible with the input generated by the other alternative set of functions. For example, nonzero.peakxmotif.g was not stored in xymats.list returned by getXYMatrices2.
It would be very helpful if you could provide some advice, thanks!
In addition, this might be an irrelevant question to the title, but I would like some suggestions from you regarding the choice of correlation tests. I am wondering if there is any criterion for choosing the test type (e.g should I prioritize results obtained from controlling for TF expression or chromatin accessibility at Level 1 or Level 2 ?).
Thanks, Zhan