Closed XinwenXiang closed 1 year ago
it may be the [BCC+15]? ,if is [BCC+15],it may lack some part. like in your accountable ring sig, you only count it should alson include the
Thanks for your interest. Yes, ESORICS 2015 refers to "Short Accountable Ring Signatures Based on DDH". The implementation replaced ElGamal with twisted ElGamal. I cannot remember the details. I am not sure if this is the reason that the code is slight different from the protocol specified in the paper.
yeah, in your implementation you use twisted EIGamml, what is twisted ElGamal? and I also want to ask: In R_sig proof to R2, R2 want prove that N ElGamal Ciphertexts has a ciphertext encrypt '1', but in your code, you find the signer index,but but in [BCC+15] it really confused me (excuse me that our server has down last days, i can't run it thanks for your answer.
I did not implement the original ESORICS 2015 protocol, but implemented a new protocol case tailored for twisted ElGamal (perhaps with some tiny optimization trick, I cannot remember the details for the moment). You can find more details about Twisted ElGamal in https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/319
thanks a lot.
hello, I'm doing some scheme's implementation, i want to ask in your nizk folder "this hpp implements the merge of (relation R1 and R2) in ESORICS 2015" is which article?