Closed ghost closed 4 years ago
goldmark is standards-compliant(CommonMark and GFM). There are many CLI tools that can parse CommonMark and GFM like pandoc.
I would like to recommend that you use these awesome CLI tools.
I'm actually really interested in something that's lightweight and modern and in a language that is on the up (Golang, Rust, perhaps Elixer).
I see that pandoc publishes via Github Releases, which is awesome, and means it would be a great candidate for my end goal - which is something that I can easily add to https://webinstall.dev (and recommend it as part of an online course I'm doing)... but it's just so big and has so many options and it lacks RPi support (no arm64 releases).
I'd prefer something like goldmark, especially since its what hugo uses and that's another one of the tools I'm recommending for the course.
If we have a goldmark command, many users would request a new feature that can not be implemented by core(in this repository) stuff.
For instance, syntax highlighting is implemented as an extension in other repository. So I think this kind of CLI tools should be maintained in a separated repository.
If we have a goldmark command, many users would request a new feature that can not be implemented by core
I really like how you keep goldmark manageable and avoid scope creep. And thank you, by the way, for a remarkable contribution.
So I think this kind of CLI tools should be maintained in a separated repository.
That's a good idea. Do you want to do that?
I think this is what I'm looking for as well, something like this?