lists in footnotes rendered oddly

[lschierer]

goldmark has https://github.com/yuin/goldmark/discussions in github. You should post only issues here. Feature requests and questions should be posted at discussions.

• [ ] goldmark is fully compliant with the CommonMark. Before submitting issue, you must read CommonMark spec and confirm your output is different from CommonMark online demo.
  • [x] Extensions(Autolink without < >, Table, etc) are not part of CommonMark spec. You should confirm your output is different from other official renderers correspond with an extension.
• [ ] goldmark is not dedicated for Hugo. If you are Hugo user and your issue was raised by your experience in Hugo, you should consider create issue at Hugo repository at first .

Please answer the following before submitting your issue:

1. What version of goldmark are you using? : goldmark@0.2.0 as provided by npm
2. What version of Go are you using? : go version go1.18.3 darwin/arm64
3. What operating system and processor architecture are you using? : OSX 12.3.1 on an M1
4. What did you do? : I have the following footnote definition:

   
   [^211020-8]: [Harry Potter Wiki](https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/)
   * "[Amortality](https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Amortality)
     Last Edited: 2021-09-06. Last Viewed: 2021-10-20.
   * "[Non-Human Spiritous Apparition](https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Non-Human_Spiritous_Apparition)"
     Last Edited: 2021-10-11. Last Viewed: 2021-10-20.

6. What did you expect to see? : I expected that the unordered list would be at the first level, the same as it would be if I had typed

• "Amortality Last Edited: 2021-09-06. Last Viewed: 2021-10-20.
• "Non-Human Spiritous Apparition" Last Edited: 2021-10-11. Last Viewed: 2021-10-20.

  
  8. What did you see instead? : It was indented several levels, using the list item style of a sub list instead of that of a top order list. 
  9. Did you confirm your output is different from [CommonMark online demo](https://spec.commonmark.org/dingus/) or other official renderer correspond with an extension?:

As footnotes are an extension, I did not check with CommonMark. I not aware of a good way to test this in another renderer with this extension, but happy to do so.

[yuin]

As mentioned in README, goldmark's footnote is an implementation of Markdown Extra.

Please try dingus https://michelf.ca/projects/php-markdown/dingus/

[lschierer]

php markdown extra via dingus tested with the following input:

test text[^some] more text

[^some]: test
    * one
    * two
    * three

produced the following html, which looks correct:

<p>test text<sup id="fnref:some"><a href="#fn:some" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup> more text</p>

<div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes">
<hr />
<ol>

<li id="fn:some" role="doc-endnote">
<p>test
* one
* two
* three&#160;<a href="#fnref:some" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#8617;&#xFE0E;</a></p>
</li>

</ol>
</div>

note there is only one level of list in the above output.

[lschierer]

mm. interesting, though that it treated the entire thing as a single list item. which isn't correct, but a different error than goldmark is generating.

[lschierer]

the test text

test text[^some] more text

[^some]: 
    * one
    * two
    * three

produces nearly the same error as goldmark:

<p>test text<sup id="fnref:some"><a href="#fn:some" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup> more text</p>

<div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes">
<hr />
<ol>

<li id="fn:some" role="doc-endnote">
<ul>
<li>one</li>
<li>two</li>
<li>three</li>
</ul>

<p><a href="#fnref:some" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#8617;&#xFE0E;</a></p>
</li>

</ol>
</div>

the difference being that goldmark (correctly) does not actually show an ordered list with a numbered bullet point in the extra wrapping list.

[lschierer]

I see what's happening, it is implementing the footnotes themselves as an ordered list, so the bullets inside are a second order list. Okay, that makes sense. Closing this.