Closed solucky-95 closed 3 years ago
Hi,
Thanks for the interest. Table 1 shows results on fine-grained datasets. On fine-grained datasets, the classes are divided into 6 tasks equally. For example R1 includes 33 classes for CUB dataset rather than 100 classes. That's probably why you got worse results than mine. Hope my answer helps.
Best,
Thanks.
Hi,
Thank you for sharing your awesome work. I have a question about results in Table 1: 'E-Pre' is a ResNet-18 model pre-trained on ImageNet without fine-tuning, and you get 78.5% R1 on the first 100 classes (suppose you are using random seed 1). If my understanding is right, then the results are a little confusing. I directly used the official ImageNet pre-trained ResNet-18 model of pytorch (set pretrained=True) and got 69.3% only for T1. Since I didn't train this model at all, it should be the same result as reported in Table 1. Should I train this model myself on ImageNet? And will it get approximately 9% improvement than the official pre-trained model? It would be wonderful if you can provide this ImageNet pre-trained model.
Best regards.