Hi,
I have a question about the automatic reference point selection.
There are two things:
1- In your methodology, the point with the least RMS phase between different loops is considered the reference. However, this point might be located in the middle of highly subsided regions, which could lead to a completely different interpretation of the final SBAS results. Am I right?
2- I am also thinking that the point with the least RMS may correspond to a high-coherence point, which could be interpreted as a stable point. So, if this point is considered as the reference point, no misunderstanding of the results would happen since it was stable.
yumorishita
commented
1 month ago
Hi, I have a question about the automatic reference point selection. There are two things: 1- In your methodology, the point with the least RMS phase between different loops is considered the reference. However, this point might be located in the middle of highly subsided regions, which could lead to a completely different interpretation of the final SBAS results. Am I right? 2- I am also thinking that the point with the least RMS may correspond to a high-coherence point, which could be interpreted as a stable point. So, if this point is considered as the reference point, no misunderstanding of the results would happen since it was stable.
What do you think about these two assumptions?
Regards