Individual Review (Mini Project)

[yuricoder07]

Links

Video Frontend Backend

Key Commits

Inheritance Integration

This helped us fill out a crucial part of the project of inheritance creating a parent class that holds all the sorting algorithms we use.

Cors fix (sort)

Helped us have a frontend backend connection (had to add a @CorrsOrigin)

Possible Improvements

Although we met all the requirements for the project I do believe we could've done better. For the frontend I believe I could've represented the data in other ways rather than just sorting them in a table. Styling was also another thing that could've been improved.

Analytics

Frontend Analytics:

Backend Analytics:

[akshat122805]

Individual Review "Akshat P" grading "Yuri S."

• [x] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [x] Video, includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute - 0.8/0.9 | Video is concise and highlights all contributions in an efficient manner, the video could have been more specific in explaining the aspect of combining different sorting methods. No captions, loud and clear.
• [x] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives - 0.7/0.9 | Issues show a good amount of progress, could be more specific in my opinion, as there are limited issues for your progress.
• [x] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions - 0.8/0.9 | Goes into depth regarding technicality, goes into depth of how Fibonacci and sorting methods were visualized

• [x] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks - 0.9/0.9 | All commits' were recorded in progress check issues, commits' are truthful as well.

  Per check.
  0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

Total Math: 0.8 + 0.7 + 0.8 + 0.9 = 3.2/3.6 = 0.88

Freeform comment.

All criteria was completed, Yuri showed understanding of the project and his key commits. He showed communication with his peers like Vinay and also talked about how he contributed to frontend through visualization. Yuri demonstrated progress through his commits, although he could have with his issues, he clearly knew what he was talking about, and demonstrated the sorting algorithms in a professional manner.

Final Score: 0.88/0.9