Open yusufaine opened 2 years ago
rejected because clearly and logically the time given is invalid 23:69
does not exist. And there are not that many parameters in the argument as well that would otherwise make it difficult for the user to identify the invalid input as the time given.
current error message to deal with inputs is considered sufficient. Improvements would be out of scope.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [type.FunctionalityBug
]
Originally [type.FeatureFlaw
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
This is a very small nit, but I think it would be good if the error message can indicate which part of the date-time is invalid