Closed tyoshino closed 9 years ago
Maybe you cannot for now since the associated body is used in texts that you're not replacing in the draft. Please take this as TODO.
On their own they each make perfect sense. I would hate to start calling the request/response's body something else. And I would hate to rename the member on request/response that exposes it.
On their own they each make perfect sense.
Agreed
I would hate to start calling the request/response's body something else.
Hmm, ok. The name is not exposed to the web but already widely used across the specs and descriptive/simple enough. Let's give good description not to confuse readers maybe with enough notes.
And I would hate to rename the member on request/response that exposes it.
Agreed
It's confusing that these different things are given the same name.