Closed baldassarreFe closed 4 years ago
The numbers you referred to ("<5 instances", "167 out of 600") should be for the HICO dataset (see ICCV'15). For HICO-DET (see WACV'18) the corresponding numbers should be "<10" and "138", which are exactly what you showed above.
Thanks for the quick reply! I must have missed the new definition of rare classes in HICO-DET, I assumed it was the same as HICO. It's all clear now ;)
I'm trying to reproduce some results on the HICO-DET dataset, but I don't seem to find the correct split between rare and non-rare classes.
According to the paper, rare hoi classes are those having <5 instances in the training set. Rare classes should be 167 of the 600 hoi classes in total.
However, if I filter the training set using this criterion I find these counts:
I checked your evaluation code and I spotted a
<10
ineval_one.m
, but even with that threshold, the number 167 doesn't come up.Can you provide a list of exactly which hoi categories you consider rare and which not? A format similar to the one you have on your website would be ideal.
Thanks!