Currently, the find command only allows user to search for pets based on their name. However, there are also scenarios where veterinary clinics need to search for pets based on their species, breed, age, sex or tags.
For example, if a specific health alert arises that affects only certain breeds or species, staff might need to quickly identify all pets of that type to notify their owners. Similarly, during routine health check reminders, staff might want to find pets of a certain age group or sex for targeted follow-ups. Tags can also be useful for filtering pets with specific medical needs or dietary restrictions. Expanding the find command to search by species, breed, age, sex, and tags would streamline these tasks, helping the clinic provide more personalized care and respond more effectively to health advisories.
You may consider putting this down in your proposed improvements section in your DG to prevent this feature flaw from being raised in the actual PE.
Currently, the find command only allows user to search for pets based on their name. However, there are also scenarios where veterinary clinics need to search for pets based on their species, breed, age, sex or tags.
For example, if a specific health alert arises that affects only certain breeds or species, staff might need to quickly identify all pets of that type to notify their owners. Similarly, during routine health check reminders, staff might want to find pets of a certain age group or sex for targeted follow-ups. Tags can also be useful for filtering pets with specific medical needs or dietary restrictions. Expanding the find command to search by species, breed, age, sex, and tags would streamline these tasks, helping the clinic provide more personalized care and respond more effectively to health advisories.
You may consider putting this down in your proposed improvements section in your DG to prevent this feature flaw from being raised in the actual PE.