Open yyccbb opened 6 months ago
No details provided by team.
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Command format for edit-an in the summary table of UG is different from that in its designated section
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
The parameter INDEX is renamed NOTE_INDEX. Based on the definition in the corresponding section for edit-an, INDEX refers to the index number shown in the displayed patient list. The new name NOTE_INDEX apparently has nothing to do with the original definition and this causes confusion.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S2/pe-interim#4995] [original labels: severity.Medium type.DocumentationBug]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
This is an oversight on our part, hence
Accepted
.However, the severity has been assigned to
Low
as it is unlikely to affect normal operations of the product, andNOTE_INDEX
should be intuitive enough for users to know that the index parameter here refers to the note's index.Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement:
The definitions are repeated and inaccurate.