Closed yang654123 closed 1 year ago
Hi @yang654123,
The result of ResNet50 has been reported in Table 1 & 2 of the main paper. Is that what you want?
Cheers, Yuyuan
Hi @yang654123,
The result of ResNet50 has been reported in Table 1 & 2 of the main paper. Is that what you want?
Cheers, Yuyuan
sorry,i want the results of classic val set based on resnet50 not blender val set.
Hi @yang654123
I'm confused, I think the validation dataset should be unique for all set-up. In case you are talking about the training set, the ResNet50 results are reported in Table 3.
Could you please provide more details, like which partition protocol or which dataset you are talking about.
Cheers, Yuyuan
sorry, i mean the results of 1464labels origin high resolution dataset which also named of classic dataset ,also called official dataset.
Hi @yang654123
I'm confused, I think the validation dataset should be unique for all set-up. In case you are talking about the training set, the ResNet50 results are reported in Table 3.
Could you please provide more details, like which partition protocol or which dataset you are talking about.
Cheers, Yuyuan haha I see,but do you have other results on particial protocol like 92,183,366,732 and so on .
Hi @yang654123
The 1464 labels results under ResNet50 are in Tab 3, while we only have resnet101 results for the splits you mentioned, as we followed CPS table. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Cheers, Yuyuan
hi ,thank you for your nice work! i have a question about the results on classic val set based on resnet 50 as backbone,so do you have it? thanks a lot.