Closed mengyuest closed 6 years ago
Hi @mengyuest , how good is your result? Did you use validation set to decide stopping point?
I haven't used validation set to decide the stopping point. I just keep training continuing till the end (350k), and used the last model generated(model-345000). I tried the experiment twice and got result (abs_rel sq_rel rms log_rms a1 a2 a3
) as 0.1759 1.8748 6.4070 0.2563 0.7668 0.9208 0.9658
and 0.1793 2.4869 6.8202 0.2626 0.7807 0.9203 0.9637
respectively (I am also not sure why we will have different results, if having set random_seed already), which I think varied from paper a lot, but I did check the parameters several times and could not figure out what's going wrong there.
I also tried several max_steps and the result (all from the last stored models) seemed varies a lot.
max_steps=50000 (model-45000)
abs_rel, sq_rel, rms, log_rms, d1_all, a1, a2, a3
0.1717, 1.2967, 5.8969, 0.2442, 0.0000, 0.7526, 0.9212, 0.9712
max_steps=100000 (model-95000)
abs_rel, sq_rel, rms, log_rms, d1_all, a1, a2, a3
0.1976, 1.5867, 6.6347, 0.2804, 0.0000, 0.6902, 0.8955, 0.9598
max_steps=200000 (model-195000)
abs_rel, sq_rel, rms, log_rms, d1_all, a1, a2, a3
0.1721, 1.5399, 6.3243, 0.2522, 0.0000, 0.7652, 0.9228, 0.9668
I checked each model trained there(in 350k steps) and the best I could get was from model-280000
which has
abs_rel, sq_rel, rms, log_rms, d1_all, a1, a2, a3
0.1569, 1.3455, 6.0061, 0.2403, 0.0000, 0.7866, 0.9284, 0.9700
Hi. I am trying to train the first stage from scratch for the depth prediction. I used the preprocess code (kitti_raw_eigen, seq=3) and train code(batch_size=4, steps=350k. lr=0.0002) suggested in README.md but could not get similar result in paper. The model I used for evaluation is in the 345000th step. I am not sure is that the best model to use. Though I can use the pretrained model to get the result, I am still curious about how to train from scratch and is there anything we need to pay attention to during the training? Thanks.