soc-se-bot
commented
9 months ago Team's Response
You might have misinterpreted our application. Our application is meant to be a integrated platform to keep track of all your dates across various dating apps. It is not a dating app!
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: Our application is meant to be a integrated platform to keep track of all your dates across various dating apps. It is not a dating app!
The above provides much clarity on what LoveBook actually is! I believe the team should have included this in the UG and DG. Looking at the screenshot I posted in the original issue, it really does not mention that the purpose of LoveBook is to keep track of all your dates across various dating apps. In fact, the opening sentence of the UG is LoveBook, is a dating-focused application, so I believe it is a reasonable assumption that most users would view LoveBook as a dating app. As a user using LoveBook for the first time during the PE, I was confused. Thus due to the lack of clarity in the UG and DG, I believe this issue should be accepted
## :question: Issue severity Team chose [`severity.Low`] Originally [`severity.Medium`] - [x] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** I believe this should be a `severity.Medium` or even higher, because it is a documentation bug that `affects most users and causes major problems for users`. A misunderstanding that LoveBook is a dating app, and not a platform to keep track of your dates, would cause many users to be confused!
not very certain of the value proposition suggested here. From my understanding, the user is required to manually add his or her own dates to the LoveBook. Then isn't this inconvenient when compared to the current dating apps out there in the market that already have an big existing database of dates for people to scroll through?