zakkinsey / PDFA-TEST

A test repository for PDFA members to learn and test gitHub actions and behaviors.
0 stars 0 forks source link

PDFUA-28: Running Headers & Footers as Artifacts #15

Open zakkinsey opened 5 years ago

zakkinsey commented 5 years ago

Jira issue originally created by user @MarkusErle:

The objective of this technique is to show how to handle running headers and footers.

 

zakkinsey commented 5 years ago

Comment created by @:

{color:#000000}Evaluation with Acrobat and JAWS {color}

{color:#000000} {color}

{color:#000000}Adobe Acrobat DC (19.010.10059){color}

{color:#000000}JAWS Version 2018.1811.2 ILM{color}

{color:#000000}Windows 10{color}

{color:#000000} {color}

JAWS reads:

 

element: Artifact | compliant What is “tagged PDF”? PDF was originally designed to provide accurate, reliable on screen and printed results for page based content. Accessibility was not a consideration. Tagged PDF, the mechanism which enables accessibility via logical structure and semantic mechanisms was added to PDF in 2001. Logo PDF Techniques Accesssiblity Summit | organized by PDF Association Tagged PDF made it possible to represent content independent of its static visual presentation, allowing any end user to access PDF content through mechanisms such as text reflow or text to speech, or via a preferred Assistive Technology (AT). What is PDF/UA? PDF/UA is the commonly accepted name for ISO 14289, an international standard defining the correct use of PDF tagging for accessibility purposes. A highly technical specification, PDF/UA identifies the components and properties of PDF technology which are relevant to accessibility, and provides requirements and restrictions on their use. History of PDF/UA Since 2004, AIIM’s PDF/UA Committee has collected stake-holders from throughout the industry to explore and develop technical requirements for accessible PDF technology. Following the publication of PDF 1.7 as ISO 32000-1 in 2008, PDF/UA was re-developed to become an ISO standard. ISO 14289-1 (PDF/UA) was first published in 2012. How PDF/UA makes the world a better place? Establishes technical requirements necessary to document creation, viewing and AT software that can provide high quality access to PDF content Provides an International Standard to guide software procurement and development Provides a technically-specific road map to conformance with WCAG 2.0 in PDF content Works with PDF/A, the ISO standard for archival PDF documents Improves customer service and employee relations Reduces liability exposure and minimizes legal uncertainty Why does the world need PDF/UA? PDF is all about reliability. For accessibility needs, however, the core PDF language provides the mechanism but not the technical requirements necessary to ensure accessibility. Tagged PDF first entered the market in 2001, but even today a substantial number of PDF documents produced on desk-top computers are untagged, and many tagged PDF documents are substandard. Consequently, most users who rely on assistive technology to read have learned to dislike PDF files for the unreliable, disjointed and grossly unsatisfactory experience they’ve so often received. PDF/UA adoption fixes this problem. Read more: https://www.pdfa.org/ PDF was originally designed to provide accurate, reliable on-screen and printed results for page- based content. Accessibility was not a consideration. Tagged PDF, the mechanism which enables accessibility via logical structure and semantic mechanisms was added to PDF in 2001. Tagged PDF made it possible to represent content independent of its static visual presentation, allowing any end user to access PDF content through mechanisms such as text reflow or text to speech, or via a preferred Assistive Technology (AT). PDF was originally designed to provide accurate, reliable on- screen and printed results for page-based content. Accessibility was not a consideration. Tagged PDF, the mechanism which enables accessibility via logical structure and semantic mechanisms was added to PDF in 2001. Tagged PDF made it possible to represent content independent of its static visual presentation, allowing any end user to access PDF content through mechanisms such as text reflow or text to speech, or via a preferred Assistive Technology (AT). PDF was originally designed to provide accurate, reliable on-screen and printed results for page-based content. Accessibility was not a consideration. Tagged PDF, the mechanism which enables accessibility via logical structure and semantic mechanisms was added to PDF in 2001. Tagged PDF made it possible to represent content independent of its static visual presentation, allowing any end user to access PDF content through mechanisms such as text reflow or text to speech, or via a preferred Assistive Technology (AT). PDF was originally designed to provide accurate, reliable on-screen and printed results for page-based content. Accessibility was not a consideration. Tagged PDF, the mechanism which enables accessibility via logical structure and semantic mechanisms was added to PDF in 2001. Tagged PDF made it possible to represent content independent of its static visual presentation, allowing any end user to access PDF content through mechanisms such as text reflow or text to speech, or via a preferred Assistive Technology (AT). PDF was originally designed to provide accurate, reliable on- screen and printed results for page-based content. Accessibility was not a consideration. Tagged PDF, the mechanism which enables accessibility via logical structure and semantic mechanisms was added to PDF in 2001. Tagged PDF made it possible to represent content independent of its static visual presentation, allowing any end user to access PDF content through mechanisms such as text reflow or text to speech, or via a preferred Assistive Technology (AT). PDF was originally designed to provide accurate, reliable on-screen and printed results for page-based content. Accessibility was not a consideration. Tagged PDF, the mechanism which enables accessibility via logical structure and semantic mechanisms was added to PDF in 2001. Tagged PDF made it possible to represent content independent of its static visual presentation, allowing any end user to access PDF content through mechanisms such as text reflow or text to speech, or via a preferred Assistive Technology (AT). PDF was originally designed to provide accurate, reliable on-screen and printed results for page-based content. Accessibility was not a consideration. Tagged PDF, the mechanism which enables accessibility via logical structure and semantic mechanisms was added to PDF in 2001. Tagged PDF made it possible to represent content independent of its static visual presentation, allowing any end user to access PDF content through mechanisms such as text reflow or text to speech, or via a preferred Assistive Technology (AT). PDF was originally designed to provide accurate, reliable on- screen and printed results for page-based content. Accessibility was not a consideration. Tagged PDF, the mechanism which enables accessibility via logical structure and semantic mechanisms was added to PDF in 2001. Tagged PDF made it possible to represent content independent of its static visual presentation, allowing any end user to access PDF content through mechanisms such as text reflow or text to speech, or via a preferred Assistive Technology (AT). PDF was originally designed to provide accurate, reliable on

screen and printed results for page

based content. Accessibility was not a consideration. Tagged PDF, the mechanism which enables accessibility via logical structure and semantic mecha nisms was added to PDF in 2001. Tagged PDF made it possible to represent content independent of its static visual presentation, allowing any end user to access PDF content t hrough mechanisms such as text reflow or text to speech, or via a preferred Assistive Technology (AT). PDF was originally designed to provide accurate, reliable on

screen and printed results for page

based content. Accessibility was not a consideration. Ta gged PDF, the mechanism which enables accessibility via logical structure and semantic mecha nisms was added to PDF in 2001. Tagged PDF made it possible to represent content independent of its static visual presentation, allowing any end user to access PDF content through mechanisms such as text reflow or text to speech, or via a preferred Assistive Technology (AT).

 

zakkinsey commented 5 years ago

Comment created by @MarkusErle:

Suptype Footer and Header is missing

zakkinsey commented 5 years ago

Comment created by @:

Attached PDF was changed to an atomic example: document with 2 pages, each with header and footer which were artifacted

zakkinsey commented 3 years ago

Comment created by @MarkusErle:

We need 2 examples: (1) header and footer is artifacted starting from the 2 instance on

(2) header and footer is artifacted starting from the 1 instance on

Add subtype

zakkinsey commented 3 years ago

Comment created by @pkopicar:

Try reusing existing pdf sample from PDFUA-32

zakkinsey commented 3 years ago

Comment created by @MarkusErle:

Add in description:

Emphasize that it is related to a section / chapter

zakkinsey commented 3 years ago

Comment created by @unknown-jira-user-3:

LWG Meeting Notes

3 alt. techniques:

Technique A

PAC3-View is presented

Technique B1:

B2.

Concerns? *Technique per document or for document part?* *A.: It is related to the section - explain more?**

 

zakkinsey commented 3 years ago

Comment created by @pkopicar:

Cleaned up

zakkinsey commented 3 years ago

Comment created by @unknown-jira-user-2:

To follow the rule of one JIRA issue per sample file, I moved the B1 example to PDFUA-211 and the B2 example to PDFUA-212

zakkinsey commented 2 years ago

Comment created by @PaulRayius:

Metadata Committee - 12/22/2021 - Updated Matterhorn and WCAG - determined to not be a WCAG fail for 1.3.1 but does apply to 1.3.2 - Meaningful Sequence.   IF the header or footer was tagged, it would cause a fail for 1.3.2 (in documents with multiple pages). 

zakkinsey commented 2 years ago

Comment created by @unknown-jira-user-3:

add page numbers as in 32!

zakkinsey commented 2 years ago

Comment created by @unknown-jira-user-3:

re-check metadata after changing the example

metadata working group is taking care of this

zakkinsey commented 2 years ago

Comment created by @PaulRayius:

Metadata has been rechecked and is good.  Jan. 26, 2022. 

zakkinsey commented 2 years ago

Comment created by @MarkusErle:

Added page numbers to the example.

File has to be cleaned up still.

zakkinsey commented 2 years ago

Comment created by @PaulRayius:

Metadata committee checked - the PDF does not look like the Pagination artifacts, or header/footer subtype, has been set.  Please recheck the file. 

It's our opinion that there are no WCAG Success Criteria that are relevant to this example.