Closed Birne94 closed 3 years ago
Merging #52 (13243a2) into master (9c89e1f) will decrease coverage by
1.08%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #52 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.37% 97.29% -1.09%
==========================================
Files 9 9
Lines 370 370
==========================================
- Hits 364 360 -4
- Misses 6 10 +4
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
opentracing_utils/libs/_requests.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
opentracing_utils/libs/_flask.py | 97.05% <0.00%> (-2.95%) |
:arrow_down: |
opentracing_utils/libs/_django.py | 97.22% <0.00%> (-2.78%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9c89e1f...13243a2. Read the comment docs.
I am not sure why the coverage for the flask and django integrations went down with this PR, I did not touch those.
👍
👍
@pitr Thanks for merging this! Is there a release planned for the near future or what is the release plan for this library?
plz +1 #53 to bump version
plz +1 #53 to bump version
done!
0.21.0 should be now out
We want to use this package to send traces from our services to lightstep. Currently, tracing for the requests library does not support passing a custom span extractor, which I added as part of this PR.