Closed AlexGacon closed 7 months ago
Perhaps this is a personal view and there may be reasons against it, but why not deploying everything in a dedicated namespace, e.g. using Helm's --namespace
flag. IMO we could get rid of all "release pod name" helper functions.
/cc @mwallschlaeger
If you go this way, you put hard requirements on how you organize the K8s cluster : you must use namespaces to organize your cluster, you cannot have several geonode deployments in the same namespace (for example, several customers with different settings in a namespace dev).
yes @AlexGacon i agree to you. one helm Chart deployment should end up in a single namespace. and tighten together all objects of a deployment with a prefix to the name of the objects is common patten. therefore i would agree on giving all objects the release name as prefix.
Task Description
Some resources don't have a name which includes the release name, making it difficult to find all the K8s resources related to a given deployment
Additional Information
at least, there are geonode-secret and geoserver-secret.