In our latest TF meeting we agreed on:
So we agreed on the following implementation details:
implement all roles currently defined in BonaRes:
Responsible party - (Role = Data Collector)
Responsible party - (Role = Data Curator)
Responsible party - (Role = Editor)
Responsible party - (Role = Hosting Institution)
Responsible party - (Role = Other)
Responsible party - (Role = Producer)
Responsible party - (Role = Project Leader)
Responsible party - (Role = Project Manager)
Responsible party - (Role = Project Member)
Responsible party - (Role = Registration Agency)
Responsible party - (Role = Registration Authority)
Responsible party - (Role = Related Person)
Responsible party - (Role = Research Group)
Responsible party - (Role = Researcher)
Responsible party - (Role = Rights Holder)
Responsible party - (Role = Sponsor)
Responsible party - (Role = Supervisor)
Responsible party - (Role = Work Package Leader)
Responsible party - (Role = Author)
Responsible party - (Role = Custodian)
Responsible party - (Role = Distributor)
Responsible party - (Role = Originator)
Responsible party - (Role = Owner)
Responsible party - (Role = Point of contact)
Responsible party - (Role = Principal Investigator)
Responsible party - (Role = Processor)
Responsible party - (Role = Publisher)
Responsible party - (Role = Resource Provider)
provide information on mapping between Datacite and INSPIRE inside the Metadata Editor
add additional information about the belongings of each field inside the database model, so distinguishing between different location is possible afterwards
As current implementation of contact roles is implemented way to undynamic I would evaluate to try to change implementation also on core geonode
Feature Description
Geonode currently uses: ISO 19115:2003 (https://github.com/GeoNode/geonode/issues/11902) which is only supporting a limited number of contact roles, lately added with: https://github.com/GeoNode/geonode/pull/10367
In our latest TF meeting we agreed on: So we agreed on the following implementation details:
As current implementation of contact roles is implemented way to undynamic I would evaluate to try to change implementation also on core geonode