Closed mwallschlaeger closed 6 days ago
Also important here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13L0YwcsIv4psKz4XLpqHpnsTv9XtRnZpMeZ1SwMxmJU/edit?pli=1&gid=396474177#gid=396474177 Should we continue using this document? Can you give me writing access???
@krmeierzalf I think i wouldn't keep the data in separate excel list. As soon as we created the organizations from ORD combined with the one from the funding agencies list, we can continue work with them in geonode and take care of them via the admin table. At this point we are also deleting the list in the docs to reduce redundancy
Task Description
In https://github.com/orgs/zalf-rdm/discussions/7, we discussed that the people.organization field should not be a free text field anymore. It must be backed with a list of organizations managed by data stewards through the admin interface. This allows us to reuse already gathered organization information, and reduce the amount of duplicates in the system. In TF we agreed that this list partially shares the same institutions as the base.FundingReference list. In other words an institution can be a funding reference or a organization people work for. Therefore we're going to have those institutions in a single list.
To prepare the unification of the people.organization and the base.FundingReference, the funding reference list may be renamed and extend by required information in the first place. New required fields are (Please doublecheck):
Further this list requires an Admin interface to add, delete or edit entries. And an API endpoint to get organizations and add or delete organizations with admin or staff rights.