davidwcarter
commented
2 years ago Good point, but it is secondary for now. We can look at it later.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 9:33 PM zander-gordan-noaa @.***> wrote:
The supplementary outcome variables like average hours fished rely on the APAIS data, which was resumed unevenly throughout 2020. More info on that here in Figure 6:
https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/2021-09/MRIP-Survey-Design-and-Statistical-Methods-2021-09-15.pdf
It seems to me, states with more COVID stringency were the ones that had to resume data collection later. It would be good to confirm this more formally with, say, a logistic regression of an indicator for whether the average hours estimate is missing on the COVID stringency index.
It will be good also to think through how this affects interpretation of the results for these supplementary outcomes...
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/zander-gordan-noaa/covidRecreation/issues/2, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADCDZ4V3Y7BU2H2S6PQWGFLU6AQGHANCNFSM5PZFSPPQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
-- David W. Carter, Ph.D.
*EconomistNOAA FisheriesU.S. Department of CommerceOffice: (305) @. @.>http://www.sefsc.noaa.gov/staff/davidcarter.htm http://www.sefsc.noaa.gov/staff/davidcarter.htm*
The contents of this message do not necessarily reflect any position of the U.S. Government.
zander-gordan-noaa
The supplementary outcome variables like average hours fished rely on the APAIS data, which was resumed unevenly throughout 2020. More info on that here in Figure 6:
https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/2021-09/MRIP-Survey-Design-and-Statistical-Methods-2021-09-15.pdf
It seems to me, states with more COVID stringency were the ones that had to resume data collection later. It would be good to confirm this more formally with, say, a logistic regression of an indicator for whether the average hours estimate is missing on the COVID stringency index.
It will be good also to think through how this affects interpretation of the results for these supplementary outcomes...