Open zapnap opened 14 years ago
Tracking the master branch is fine with me. Another idea would be to regenerate the documentation if the commit contains a '.document' file or is from the master branch. But that behaviour probably is more complicated than necessary.
Rdoc.info currently only tracks and builds docs for your master branch. I've been thinking about creating optional support to track more than one branch through some URL scheme but this definitely covers the most common case for now.
Another option would be allowing the default branch ref to be specified in the .document file, maybe. Thoughts? Is this even necessary?