search

zardus / idalink

Some glue facilitating remote use of IDA (the Interactive DisAssembler) Python API.
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License
77 stars 18 forks source link

0.11 on pypi vs 0.10 here? #17

Closed TheRealTroff closed 5 years ago

TheRealTroff commented 7 years ago

What I'm "really" trying to do is use angr with the ida loader, so my original idalink install was done with pip install angr. This repo appears to be clearly a further development, but at the same time cle used by angr seems to rely on argument names that are different in the two sources. Is the intention for cle to work with the latest idalink should the used by cle/angr/pypi be considered a fork?

zardus commented 7 years ago

Ideally, idalink (this repo) should work with CLE as a loader backend, but we don't have any automated tests because IDA is IDA. As we very rarely use the IDA backend, it's possible that the projects diverged and CLE's interaction with idalink needs to be updated...

Manouchehri commented 7 years ago

I believe 0.11 on PyPI is from commit 7cea20535a6c5c8d5406ba3286a62653eaf4ea98 here.

Version numbers are a bit confusing; can I bump this repo to 0.12 to make it a bit more clear?

zardus commented 7 years ago

Sure!

On Jan 1, 2017 12:02 AM, "David Manouchehri" notifications@github.com wrote:

I believe 0.11 on PyPI is from commit 7cea205 https://github.com/zardus/idalink/commit/7cea20535a6c5c8d5406ba3286a62653eaf4ea98 here.

Version numbers are a bit confusing; can I bump this repo to 0.12 to make it a bit more clear?

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/zardus/idalink/issues/17#issuecomment-269894174, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADSzl7J1Eor9gJ7Qyt_UkkottEWWBpkUks5rN0-UgaJpZM4KE30- .