Closed jeff-mccoy closed 3 years ago
Dang. Thats annoying. Lets put it in S3 then like we do for k9s.
I've noticed a couple things about kubescape actually that I'm not wild about. Makes me kinda want to fork it and do it better than they are.
Here's the updated values, but want to wait until #71 is in to avoid more merge conflict fun:
files:
- source: https://zarf-public.s3-us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com/kubescape
shasum: 2754848328ce4ca288c8d03bb66a04ada08e326f6621195d28af903ae9d15884
target: "/usr/local/bin/kubescape"
executable: true
- source: https://zarf-public.s3-us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com/kubescape-nsa
shasum: 25b6dda6ce2ad36bf6a4ea8d1e0ef0c6bda73f9111f4c0d71f260c36a16c6498
target: "/usr/local/bin/kubescape-framework-nsa.json"
The remote link for the kubescape binary seems to be mutable therefore invalidating the SHA256 hash.