Closed MSanKeys963 closed 1 year ago
LGTM. Did you look into redirecting from the "draft" URL? (Sorry if that was handled elsewhere?)
Also: we might want to make a list of all of these follow-up steps that are required after a ZEP is accepted (...in ZEP0000?)
e.g., https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-specs/issues/227#issuecomment-1670448503 etc. etc.
LGTM. Did you look into redirecting from the "draft" URL? (Sorry if that was handled elsewhere?)
Thanks, @joshmoore. I've already added the redirect from draft → accepted.
I've just changed the links in the specification document for clarity.
we might want to make a list of all of these follow-up steps that are required after a ZEP is accepted
Created https://github.com/zarr-developers/zeps/issues/44 for this.
Hi everyone. 👋🏻
Building this on #260.
The changes in this PR are as follows:
After going through the recent changes introduced by #260, I realised the date for ZEP0001 acceptance was mentioned as 13th May. The actual date for acceptance is 15th May, when the last vote came in. Check here and here.
Also, we're mentioning Zarr core development team in the specification documents. This shows no team members, and this link throws a 404 to anyone outside our GitHub org. I suggest we remove the hyperlink until we make the teams public, which is visible to everyone (especially users outside the org).
Please have a look and let me know your thoughts.
CC: @zarr-developers/zep1-editors @jhamman