Closed d-v-b closed 3 months ago
@d-v-b, is this PR ready for review?
@MSanKeys963 yes!
how can we move forward with this? I think it's important to make these changes quickly, before we get skew between implementations.
@zarr-developers/steering-council - this PR has sat without review for 4 months. Can we move it forward please?
@d-v-b: do you want to take a look at the conflict?
@d-v-b: do you want to take a look at the conflict?
done!
this PR removes support for implicit groups (Zarr groups with no metadata documentation) from the spec. See #291 for the motivation. Besides changing the content of the text, I don't know what else to change, so I'm keeping this a draft for now.
A mergeable version of this PR would include a section explaining what implicit groups are, why they were added previously, and why they are now removed. I am happy to add this if it looks like this PR has legs.
Related discussion: #184