Open zatkiller opened 3 years ago
UG specifies datetime format as DD-MM-YYYY HH:MM format. However the example given is in the DD-MM-YYYY format. While this may be valid, I think a better example using the full DD-MM-YYYY HH:MM format should be used for a clearer demonstration
Your response not required for this bug as the team has accepted the bug as it is.
UG specifies datetime format as DD-MM-YYYY HH:MM format. However the example given is in the DD-MM-YYYY format. While this may be valid, I think a better example using the full DD-MM-YYYY HH:MM format should be used for a clearer demonstration