Closed mpolitze closed 3 years ago
Merging #42 (5b1fd42) into master (dad9520) will increase coverage by
0.01%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #42 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 96.74% 96.75% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 14 14
Lines 675 679 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 653 657 +4
Misses 22 22
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/rdflib-graph.js | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dad9520...5b1fd42. Read the comment docs.
On a second thought: my Implementation likely falls for cyclic subClass relationships. AFAIK they are forbidden by RDFS but you never know...
Will update the PR later this week.
Thanks :)
I created a separate issue for the cyclic subClass relationship problem: https://github.com/zazuko/rdf-validate-shacl/issues/43
Hi,
this is related to issue #41.
As pointed out there
getSubClassesOf
is not resolving transitive subclasses. I made a small fix and an additional test that verifies the behaviour and that can be replicated on https://shacl.org/playground/ (I do not know if that is the intended place for such kinds of tests though) .