Closed doublep closed 1 month ago
Hi @doublep, thanks very much and sorry for late reply. I was so busy in the past few days, and I'll be busy for at least severy days. I'll deal with merging when I'm free. Thanks again.
Hi @doublep , sorry for the late response, I just merged your PR into a branch eldev
. After getting a little familiar with eldev and this PR, I'll merge it into the master branch. Thanks.
Feel free to use if you want, but I'm not interested in developing anything at this rate.
Hi @doublep , sorry, it's all my fault. Normally it wouldn't need this so long time to get a PR merged. I started to prepare an immportant exam to get a cerfication in April, and I just finished this Tuesday, and during this period of time, I had busy work and also switched department and so on. So not in the mood for dealing with other things. But anyway, thank you again for putting effort for helping improve this package.
As discussed in issue #33.
lspce.el
(only comments, doesn't affect functionality). Eldev needs this: it requires that projects have metadata, e.g. declare their dependencies..gitignore
to remove the generic stuff and actually adapt to the project.If this gets accepted, I'll update
README.org
as appropriate. However, as mentioned above, this is purely an addition, it doesn't invalidate any existing installation methods.