Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
First, I am happy that it works even with thousands of active threads (except
this slow report).
And the http stream is probably already compressed in gzip by the server and
then decompressed by the browser before the rendering of the html. You can
check that by looking at the "Content-Encoding: gzip" http header in the
response.
And some questions: how do you know that the JS interpreter blocks the web
browser and are you sure that it is not css or layout for example? have you
tried the report in google chrome/firefox/opera?
Original comment by evernat@free.fr
on 9 Sep 2010 at 10:08
Yes, it works fine even with many threads! It's been critical in resolving
server issues thus far. Kudos for that!
It seems to work OK in Firefox -- Safari shows the JS warning. I am just
worried what will happen when we hit 30,000 or so threads. This page already
takes several seconds to render (with ~7000 threads) and is a >25 MB download.
Original comment by seh...@gmail.com
on 10 Sep 2010 at 1:25
First it seems recommended not to use safari but to use mozilla firefox (or a
bit better in my case google chrome) to display html reports when there are
thousands of threads. And html reports are already compressed as gzip and
uncompressed by the browser with a ratio of about 1/30 (30 KB compressed for
900 KB uncompressed).
And it is good to know that javamelody has no problem with 7000 threads and
7000 active http requests, except that reports are quite large when
uncompressed (thanks).
Then I have changed things in order to display the threads in their own page
("?part=threads") when there are more than 500 of them, and to display the
"current requests" in their own page ("?part=currentRequests") when there are
more than 500 of them.
If there are less than 500 threads or current requests, then nothing is changed
in the reports.
This is commited in trunk for next release and I have made a new build, which
is available at
http://javamelody.googlecode.com/files/javamelody-20100913.jar
Original comment by evernat@free.fr
on 12 Sep 2010 at 11:23
This is great, thanks! This will be helpful also when looking @ JavaMelody on
the iPhone, as it too uses Safari (and has a much lower memory threshold)
Original comment by seh...@gmail.com
on 13 Sep 2010 at 5:17
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
seh...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2010 at 7:09