Closed TeeratatK closed 6 months ago
Measurements have to be drawn from the same samples in order to perform any kind of association/correlation analysis. If you have an extra sample, you can drop it, but only four samples is really small for this kind of approach anyway.
I'm sorry, my question might make you confuse. I work with 3 phyloseq objects (5 replicates for each, total of 15 samples) and use for creating cross-domain analysis. But one phyloseq object has only 4. I think it causes an error above for this reason. Can you recommend how to overcome this problem?
Same answer. The number of samples and same names must match between all of the objects for cross domain measurements. There is no built- in way to subset the samples for inter- vs intra- domain objects. I could consider adding that but you'd have to do that yourself given the current implementation
On Sun, Apr 7, 2024, 12:54 PM TeeratatK @.***> wrote:
I'm sorry, my question might make you confuse. I work with 3 phyloseq objects (5 replicates for each, total of 15 samples) and use for creating cross-domain analysis. But one phyloseq object has only 4. I think it causes an error above for this reason. Can you recommend how to overcome this problem?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/zdk123/SpiecEasi/issues/257#issuecomment-2041528780, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAUD2RCMAIEOHSEQEX77EL3Y4F25JAVCNFSM6AAAAABF3EQG4GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANBRGUZDQNZYGA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
I work with phyloseq objects. I have a problem with a number of replicates that are not the same (one has 5 and another has 4) for making cross-domain analysis. How to deal with data like this?
Error in spiec.easi.list(datalist, method = method, sel.criterion = sel.criterion, : Do not run multi.spiec.easi with unidentical sample scheme