We had support in the code for parsing unit fields like bytes &size=1 (note the missing : for an anon field). This was neither documented nor tested.
Since code might have used this without issue one could consider this a breaking change. At the same time it was never properly documented as supported.
I came across this when looking at the reproducer in #1795.
We had support in the code for parsing unit fields like
bytes &size=1(note the missing:for an anon field). This was neither documented nor tested.Since code might have used this without issue one could consider this a breaking change. At the same time it was never properly documented as supported.
I came across this when looking at the reproducer in #1795.