gianarb
commented
8 years ago Ping @weierophinney @ezimuel and all, I try to explain better my thought.
It is an opensource community and in this environment there are more people that spent his time to help, maintain this framework and this community live. The time pass and the priorities change, but the community must survive and the project and the service grow.
It is perfect there are more developers into the core team that are inactive on github from much time, I think that it is good thing but only if the community works to maintain itself live.
We will be hypocrites if we said the opposite but an height number of people inactive stops the run and the desire to helps this community. We are not here to enter into the ZF Team, it is a wrong motivation to help.
But in my opinion an active core team is the base for a good project, ZF is big, Apigility is big, the codebase is very big. The split of this framework borns to increase this type of freedom, how can we exploit this possibility?
Thanks a lot! :) Please ping me here if my text is impossibile to understand :+1:
Hello, I read this page different times, in first because I am crazy and in second because in my opinion this is a clear and good guidelines.
Exists an equals idea, not about the contents but about the idea for ZF? There are different maintainers that ATM are not active, it is perfect! If the life change and the priority change PERFECT! It is free, but it is not the paradise is not forever. I believe.. because the framework grows.
If you have not time at the moment PERFECT, but what is our position about this thing?
Maybe this a meeting about this topic should be a good stuff for all, a good way to increase the engagement and to use the best time from all.
Thanks a lot!