Open geerteltink opened 7 years ago
Most likely BC compliance: changing it would be a major BC break...
This repository has been closed and moved to laminas/laminas-filter; a new issue has been opened at https://github.com/laminas/laminas-filter/issues/7.
Is there any reason why DateTime::ISO8601 is still used in DateTimeFormatter?
Taken from the docs:
DateTime::ISO8601 DATE_ISO8601 ISO-8601 (example: 2005-08-15T15:52:01+0000) Note: This format is not compatible with ISO-8601, but is left this way for backward compatibility reasons. Use DateTime::ATOM or DATE_ATOM for compatibility with ISO-8601 instead.
DateTime::ATOM DATE_ATOM Atom (example: 2005-08-15T15:52:01+00:00)