Closed Maks3w closed 9 years ago
:+1:
Regardless of whether or not this is targeted at 3.0, is still a BC break, and should be labeled as such, as the change has ramifications:
One reason to potentially keep the name is that this is one plugin manager that often is referenced with others in the same connect: validator, filter, and form plugin managers. Keeping the name prevents the necessity of aliasing when these are referenced together.
I did remove the BC break label because this can be done in bc way and do the removal of the old class on v3
This is a naming convention so I agree with that.
It's redundant to repeat component name in class name.
This large class name produces inconsistent method names in consumer classes (see
Factory::setInputFilterManager
)